Breaking the vicious cycle of poverty through microcredit


Grammeen Info

The Grameen Bank is based on the voluntary formation of small groups of five people to provide mutual, morally binding group guarantees in lieu of the collateral required by conventional banks. At first only two members of a group are allowed to apply for a loan. Depending on their performance in repayment the next two borrowers can then apply and, subsequently, the fifth member as well.
The assumption is that if individual borrowers are given access to credit, they will be able to identify and engage in viable income-generating activities - simple processing such as paddy husking, lime-making, manufacturing such as pottery, weaving, and garment sewing, storage and marketing and transport services. Women were initially given equal access to the schemes, and proved not only reliable borrowers but astute enterpreneurs. As a result, they have raised their status, lessened their dependency on their husbands and improved their homes and the nutritional standards of their children. Today over 90 percent of borrowers are women.

Intensive discipline, supervision, and servicing characterize the operations of the Grameen Bank, which are carried out by "Bicycle bankers" in branch units with considerable delegated authority. The rigorous selection of borrowers and their projects by these bank workers, the powerful peer pressure exerted on these individuals by the groups, and the repayment scheme based on 50 weekly installments, contribute to operational viability to the rural banking system designed for the poor. Savings have also been encouraged. Under the scheme, there is provision for 5 percent of loans to be credited to a group find and Tk 5 is credited every week to the fund.

Read more!

Basic Facts About Microfinance

United Nations Capital Development Fund
(www.UNCDF.org)

Comprehensive impact studies have demonstrated that: (i) microfinance helps very poor households Meet basic needs and protect against risks; (ii) the use of financial services by low-income households is associated with improvements in household economic welfare and enterprise stability or growth; (iii) by supporting women’s economic participation, microfinance helps to empower women, thus promoting gender-equity and improving household well-being; (iv) for almost all significant impacts, the magnitude of impact is positively related to the length of time that clients have been in the programme.

The demand for microfinance services is largely unmet. Estimates of the global demand ranges from 400 to 500 million households of which only around 30 million are reported to have access to sustainable microfinance services in 2002. Although many poor and low-income people do not yet have access to financial services, the number of customers that use microfinance, has grown between 25 and 30 percent annually over the past five years.

Other important insights concerning microfinance include: In the 1990s, average per capita income growth was less than 3% in 125 developing and transition countries, and was negative in 54 countries. In a further 71 countries, growth was below the 3% a year needed to double incomes in a generation. (UNDP, Human Development Report, 2003)

At least 30 million people now have access to microfinance (Unitus). The existing 10,000 Microfinance Institutes (MFIs) reach only 4% of the potential market (2001 World Bank Statistics). At least 90% of eligible self-employed lack access to microcredit programs. Unmet demand is around 270,000,000 (Unitus). In Africa, women account for more than 60 per cent of the rural labour force and contribute up to 80 per cent of food production, yet receive less than 10 per cent of credit provided to farmers.
(Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

The World Bank estimates that there are now over 7000 microfinance institutions, serving some 16 million poor people in developing countries. The total cash turnover of MFIs world-wide is estimated at US$2.5 billion and the potential for new growth is outstanding. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

There is concern that official assistance will be diverted from vital primary care aid programmes such as health, water projects and education into MFIs, owing to their popularity among donors. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)
Though women appear to benefit most, studies indicate that many loans awarded to and paid back by women are in fact used by men. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

The widely-imitated Grameen Bank in Bangladesh aims to provide credit to those in extreme poverty. Some 94 per cent of those who meet the bank's criteria and take up loans are women. Grameen borrowers keep up repayments at a rate of around 98 per cent. The Bank lends US$30 million a month to 1.8 million needy borrowers. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

Savings are important both as a vital safety net for the poor and as a source of funding that does not rely on external sources. Many strong MFIs, notably in Africa, recycle the savings of needy clients as a principal source of loan funds for their customers. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

The Microcredit Summit estimates that US$21.6 billion is needed to provide microfinance to 100 million of the world's poorest families. The Summit planners say it should be possible to raise US$2 billion from borrowers' savings alone. The final figure may be even higher. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

Studies have shown that during an eight year period, among the poorest in Bangladesh with no credit service of any type, only 4 percent pulled themselves above the poverty line. But with individuals and families with credit from Grameen Bank, more than 48% rose above the poverty line. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

It is estimated that, worldwide, there are 13 million microcredit borrowers, with US$ 7 billion in outstanding loans, and generating repayment rates of 97 percent. It has been growing at a rate of 30
percent annual growth. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

Fewer than 2 per cent of poor people have access to financial services (credit or savings) from sources other than money lenders. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

Under 10 million of the 500 million people who run micro and small enterprises have access to financial support for their businesses. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

There is a potential demand for microcredit services from seven million borrowers. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

There is a potential demand for microsavings services from 19 million savers. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

The world's seven richest men could wipe out global poverty. Their combined wealth is more than enough to provide the basic needs of the poorest quarter of the world's people. (Data Snapshots on Microfinance – The Virtual Library on Microcredit)

Studies of the impact of microcredit in more than 24 countries found dramatic improvements in household income levels. These improvements took place primarily through growth in the borrower’s business, which translated into increased household income. The studies found that access to microcredit allowed the borrower to increase the number of goods or services sold and reduce the costs of supplies and raw materials. As a result, sales increased and profits grew 25% to 40%. (Unitus)

The top 5 MFIs reach almost half of the market. (2001 World Bank Statistics)

Only 1% of MFIs are financially stable. (2001 World Bank Statistics)

MFIs reach self-sufficiency through cost and income structures that vary by region: Asian FSS MFIs achieve a high level of profitability due to low costs. In the other regions, Eastern Europe, Latin America and Africa, MFIs face high costs and reach self-sufficiency through a combination of higher income and productivity. (Issabelle Barres, Microbanking Bulletin, 2002)

In Indonesia, borrowers increased their incomes by 12.9 percent compared to increases of 3 percent in control-group incomes. Another study on Bank Rakyat Indonesia borrowers on the island of Lombok in Indonesia reports that the average incomes of clients had increased by 112 percent and that 90 percent of households had moved out of poverty. (CGAP, Focus Notes. 24, Elizabeth Littlefield)

Microfinance programs from different regions report increasing decision-making roles of women clients. The Women’s Empowerment Program in Nepal found that 68 percent of its members were making decisions on buying and selling property, sending their daughters to school, negotiating their children’s marriages, and planning their family. These decisions traditionally were made by husbands. World Education, which combines education with financial services, found that women were in a stronger position to ensure female children had equal access to food, schooling, and medical care. TSPI in the Philippines reported that program participation increased the percentage of women who were principal household-fund managers from 33 percent to 51 percent. In the control group, only 31 percent of women were principal fund managers. (CGAP, Focus Notes. 24, Elizabeth Littlefield)

The number of poor people with access to microcredit schemes rose from 7.6 million in 1997 to 26.8 million in 2001—21 million of them women, enabling them to control assets, make economic decisions and assume control of their lives. According to some estimates, 5% of microfinance programme participants could lift their families out of poverty each year. (UNDP, Human Development Report, 2003)

As of December 31, 2001, 2,186 microcredit institutions reported reaching 54,904,102 clients, 26,806,014 of whom were among the poorest when they took their first loan. Nine hundred ninety- four institutions submitted a 2002 Institutional Action Plan outlining their progress. Assuming five persons per family, the 26.8 million poorest clients reached by the end of 2001 affected some 134 million family members. (Microcredit Summit Report 2002)

Over the previous two years, the growth in the number of very poor women reached has gone from 10.3 million in 1999, to 14.2 million in 2000. Now, as of 2001, 21,169,754 women have been reached. This is a 49.6 percent increase in the number of poorest women reached from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2001. This increase represents an additional 7,016,841 poorest women reported with microloans in the last year. (Microcredit Summit Report 2002)

Over the last five years the number of poorest clients reached has grown by 350 percent, from 7.6 million at the end of 1997 to 26.8 million at the end of 2001. (Microcredit Summit Report 2002)

Data from the Micro Banking Bulletin reports that 63 of the world's top MFIs had an average rate of return, after adjusting for inflation and after taking out subsidies programs might have received, of about 2.5% of total assets. This compares favorably with returns in the commercial banking sector and gives credence to the hope of many that microfinance can be sufficiently attractive to mainstream into the retail banking sector. (CGAP)

Socially responsible investing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socially responsible investing describes an investment strategy which combines the intentions to maximize both financial return and social good. In general, socially responsible investors favor corporate practices which are environmentally responsible, support workplace diversity, and increase product safety and quality. Some (not all) also avoid businesses involved in alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons and other military industries, and/or abortion.

The beginning of socially responsible investing could be attributed to many people and many places. Many believe social investing began with the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). In 1758, the Quaker Philadelphia Yearly Meeting prohibited members from participating in the business of buying or selling humans. Religious institutions have been at the forefront of social investing ever since. One of the most articulate early adopters of SRI was John Wesley (1703-1791), one of the founders of the Methodist Church. A sermon of his, entitled “The Use of Money,” outlined his basic tenets of social investing – i.e. not to harm your neighbor through your business practices and to avoid industries like tanning and chemical production that pollute rivers and streams.

Modern SRI movement began during the Vietnam War. Many people living during the era remember a picture in June of 1972 of a naked nine year-old girl, Phan Thị Kim Phúc, running towards a photographer screaming, her back burning from the napalm dropped on her village. That photograph channelled outrage against Dow Chemical, the manufacturer of napalm, and prompted protests across the country against Dow Chemical and other companies profiting from the Vietnam War. In the late 1970s, SRI activism turned its attention to nuclear power and automobile emissions control.

Read more!

The Sustainability Yearbook 2006

The Year 2005 was an encouraging year for the sustainability investing market. Increasing investor demand – from retail to institutional asset owners – for this strategy was observed across the globe. At the same time, companies worldwide moved sustainability up their agenda to use it as a key source of competitive advantage. This is emphasized by the fact that sustainability indicators are increasingly linked to financial value drivers and integrated into Annual Reports. The corporate sustainability assessment that SAM conducted in 2005 perceived an improvement in sustainability performance across all sectors. Companies are converging in first generation sustainability themes like corporate governance. Transparency and accountability along the whole supply chain are increasingly visible through policies and control mechanisms. On the other hand, substantial room for progress in sustainability remains on the corporate agenda. One example is the area of human capital management. Although corporations widely recognize and acknowledge the importance of it for their success, this area remains an important differentiating factor. One of the issues that raised particular attention both on the corporate side as well as in the investment community in 2005 is climate change. A report prepared for the Carbon Trust and the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change stated that “virtually all classes of pension assets have the potential to be affected by climate change”. To help better evaluate those risks and opportunities, the demand for better information about corporate greenhouse gas emissions and how companies plan to mitigate the impact of climate change, is increasing. One example is the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), a coalition of institutional investors with more than USD 21 trillion in assets. The project’s third report, released in 2005, showed a significantly increased awareness of climate change and disclosure of related data among US corporations. The integration of the sustainability issues into the business processes is particularly driven by the Governance, Risk, and Compliance agenda. Since the publication of the COSO II framework for enterprise risk management in September 2004, leading companies have put more emphasis on the non-financial risks and opportunities. Even more broadly, the ever increasing requirements from laws, regulations, and stakeholder expectations are calling for an integrated framework for governance, risk management, and compliance, turning it from a reactive response to becoming a value-adding principle.
The third Sustainability Yearbook, published by SAM and PricewaterhouseCoopers, takes these topics up, showing interesting background information as well as relevant SAM data. PwC presents insights from its dialogue with CEOs on Governance, Risk Management and Compliance. Moreover, the Sustainability Yearbook presents SAM’s research approach and provides portraits of 58 sectors, including data that SAM compiled in 2005.

Read more!

Making Globalization Work for All

United Nations Development Programme - Annual Report 2007

As we review the activities of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) over the last year, it’s clear we face a double challenge. First, there is the overall coherence and “delivering as one” agenda, which is critical for the entire UN development system. As chair of the UN Development Group, the UNDP Administrator has a special role, working together with UN colleagues, in moving forward with reform. As we put in place the measures needed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the UN system at the country level, the idea is not to merge the various mandates or organizations, but rather to build on their skills and expertise so that the UN delivers in a more coherent way and is more effective in building the links between what happens at the country level with the global policy debate.
The second challenge we face relates to UNDP itself. UNDP is a key partner in building capacity for human development focused around four areas: poverty reduction, democratic governance, crisis prevention and recovery, and environment and energy. As set out in UNDP’s Strategic Plan 2008-2011, we need to continue to deliver in these areas on the ground, providing knowledge, policy advice, advocacy and technical support to programme countries on the basis of accumulated good practice and our comparative advantage.

Read more!

The Albert Einstein Institute - Report on Activities

Since publishing our last Report on Activities, the pace of our work has increased in all three of our mission areas: research, sharing results, and consultations. We have responded to requests for literature from pro-democracy organizations in places like Azerbaijan, Haiti, Ukraine, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. Consultations about strategic nonviolent struggle were arranged for movements in Serbia, Venezuela, Belarus, and Tibet. As the number of successful nonviolent struggles increase, others are realizing that this form of conflict is a realistic alternative to violent resistance against authoritarian regimes. Requests for translations have increased so much that they now far exceed our available resources to meet this demand. The same is true of requests for consultations.

Read more!

Freedom in the World 2006

Freedom House Report

Freedom House has prepared this overview report as a companion to our annual survey on the state of global political rights and civil liberties, Freedom in the World. We are publishing this report to assist policymakers, human rights organizations, democracy advocates, and others who are working to advance freedom around the world. We also hope that the report will be useful to the work of the new United Nations Human Rights Council.
The reports are excerpted from Freedom in the World 2006, which surveys the state of freedom in 192 countries and 14 select territories. The ratings and accompanying essays are based on events from December 1, 2004 through November 30, 2005. The 17 countries and 3 territories profiled in this report are drawn from the total of 45 countries and 8 territories that are considered to be Not Free and whose citizens endure systematic and pervasive human rights violations.
Included in this report are eight countries judged to have the worst records: Burma, Cuba, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Also included are two territories, Chechnya and Tibet, whose inhabitants suffer intense repression. These states and regions received the Freedom House survey’s lowest rating: 7 for political rights and 7 for civil liberties. Within these entities, state control over daily life is pervasive and wide-ranging, independent organizations and political opposition are banned or suppressed, and fear of retribution for independent thought and action is part of daily life. In the case of Chechnya, the rating in large measure reflects the fallout of a vicious conflict that in the last 12 years has disrupted normal life and resulted in some 200,000 deaths.
The report also includes nine further countries near the bottom of Freedom House's list of the most repressive: Belarus, China, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Laos, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Zimbabwe. The territory of Western Sahara is also included in this group. While these states scored slightly better than the “worst of the worst,” they offer very limited scope for private discussion while severely suppressing opposition political activity, impeding independent organizing, and censoring or punishing criticism of the state.
Massive human rights violations take place in nearly every part of the world. This year's roster of the “most repressive” includes countries from the Americas, the Middle East, Central Asia, Africa, and East Asia; they represent a wide array of cultures and levels of economic development. This report from Freedom House to the United Nations focuses on states and regions that have seen some of the world’s most severe repression and most systematic and brutal violations of human dignity. Our report seeks to focus the attention of the United Nations Human Rights Council on states and territories that deserve investigation and condemnation for their widespread violations.

Read more!